So are they right?
Absolutely not.
Under the War Powers Resolution, which was passed over President Nixon's veto pen in 1973, the President can commit U.S. soldiers for up to sixty days without congressional approval in any fight under one of two circumstances (specific authorization and direct attack) . This law allows for quick, decisive military strikes and appropriate oversight.
(For those playing at home: The U.N. resolution is specific authorization.)
Maummar Gaddafi |
What say you?
I say: it's Constitutional in the short term, but man, Obama is a hypocrite
ReplyDelete1. I believe Congress should vote to authorize an extended United States mission in Libya - ground troops and the removal of Qaddafi.
ReplyDelete2. I absolutely agree, but I'm more concerned with the war right now than hitting President Obama on his hypocritical statements on War - that's for next year's campaign.
The U.N. trumps the Constitution? No, I don't think so.
ReplyDeleteThe Constitution gives complete control of our Air Force, Army and Navy to the President, while the War Powers Resolution says soldiers can only be used with specific authorization.
ReplyDeleteWe're a member of the U.N. and they gave all of their members specific authorization to attack Libya. Obama's job is to get Congress to extend our mission in Libya before the 60 days is up.
It was Obama's decision to deploy U.S. forces; a decision that is uniquely his: by Constitutional determination and legal statute.
I say it's 61 days...what say YOU?
ReplyDelete