The only rallying cry they see to have is, "We are the 99%," a lie that spits in the face of the facts. However, it appears that OWS has a new cry: kill the police. Occupy Wall Street is now advising people to resist arrest. And they do not mean peacefully existing arrest. No, instead OWS suggests that, if a police officer tries to arrest you, you have the right to murder him on the spot:
Just some examples of their insanity. After an OWSer rushed police and was hit over the head, another protester took exception and screamed, "SOMEBODY KILL THESE COPS:"
The post is as crazy as you might think, as it claims that OWS must go out and kill, "secret spies" are everywhere, and that chips are being implanted in our brains:
Technology is used to control you from the invention of TV to the atom bomb and the next invention to be used is the smartphone. Next invention will be the chipimplant which will promiss a life of heavensand without it you are lost.You would think that an absolutely insane post like this would be lambasted or, at least, laughed at. Nope. In fact, OWS is in complete agreement with this nutjob with comments such as:
Please bookmark!
These people are, as Borat would say, "You are retire? Mental or physical?"
ReplyDeleteThis article is absolutely nuts.
ReplyDeleteYup, these people are crazy
ReplyDeleteThey are following the same path as leftist revolutionaries in the past. Start out aggitating and promising utopia, and evolve into violent thugs that kill the inconvenient individuals that don't comply. Fortunately these nebishes don't have what it takes for violence on a large scale.
ReplyDeleteGood stuff, linked @ RR:
ReplyDeleteRecommended Saturday Family Reading~
The narrative is in sane, and how much has this cost taxpayers, setting aside the millions of dollars of property damage?
ReplyDeleteYour whole blog here is trash. You are claiming the occupiers are violent because of some shit you read on the internet?
ReplyDeleteI am sure you have never heard of agent provacatuers either and if you have you probably don't believe it.
Either way this is a load of BS. The vast vast majority of OWS desire non violent solutions. A very small minority proposing answering the extreme violence that the POLICE ARE INSTIGATING in kind but they are the minority.
Go back to sleep sheeple. People are trying to accomplish some good in this fucked up prison state.
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteYou are retarded, dude. Is everything in your life a conspiracy theory? Agent provocateurs (which I spelled correctly)? A much, much better argument would be: hey, there are some people in the movement that are violent, but most are peaceful.
But nope. You instantly go full retard and blame some nameless omnipresent force that puts people EVERYWHERE, but still doesn't have the power to stop the tens of thousands on various websites. Your logic is so fractured and stupid, please never have children.
On top of it all are the thousands of examples of OWS violence. Your lie about secret, malevolent agents falls incredibly flat with the overwhelming evidence that you are wrong. This isn't some movie, dumbass. If you cannot think this through, your brain is practically dead.
Go back to sleep, sheep. Baaaaaaaaaaa
People cry because the banks take back the homes that people do not pay for. When it was the people that sighed on about 60 pages of paper at the title company. The people had the terms explained many times.the government simply gave the banks some money to recoup what was being lost because people quit paying their bet both for houses, cars, and credit cards. And now those people are crying because the banks got some of what they lost back. But I guarantee you that if these dope heads lost even one dollar in a bad business transaction they would be in court screaming for that dollar back. They want to limit business profit but want to not have their earnings limited. Isn't that a double standard? They have no self control, and no personal responsibility. They place blame everywhere accept where it belongs. ON THEM. They make bad decisions and then cry about it and point fingers. It was only right that the banks got some money back after all those losers took out loans and then refused to pay. Do you know how many billions banks loose each year in bad debt? Do you know how many people run to bankruptcy court and don't end up paying for that house full of crap? Big business has to charge more to make up for the losses from all the irresponsible losers that are down in the parks crying foul because no one will give them any more free money. It IS THEIR FAULT THEY NEED TO OWN THEIR MISTAKES AND HAVE SOME PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ONCE.. ( aka being an adult).
ReplyDeleteBoys and girls - demonizing the OWS-types for quoting U.S. case law is DUMB.
ReplyDelete“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.
As for grounds for arrest: “The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)
There are TONS more. Half the internet is talking about this.. killing cops and this occupy stuff. I hear one person say today, 'Let them eat cake!'
ReplyDeleteThis frightened me -greatly- because we all know what that means for us!
I took some screenshots and placed them here as proof.
http://i.imgur.com/vAJZ6.jpg
Obama is a muslim
ReplyDeleteيا مجموعة من المثليين ،
اسمي اوباما وانا اكره كل واحد منكم. كنت غبية لوطي المسيحيين والسذاجة ذلك. حقيقة أن فقط 20 في المئة من كنت اعتقد انني من المسلمين يعني أن بقية كنت أعمى. أنا ببطء تحويل أمريكا إلى دولة مسلمة. أنت تعرف هذا كل الأرض مسجد الصفر هو سكران حتى على بعد نحو ، انها مجرد بداية.
عندما أبدأ العمل مع "عملية "Operation Crescent Moon" القمر" في وقت ما مايو 2011 ، سيكون من غير المشروعة للاساءة الى المسلمين. هذا صحيح ، تحت راية "الحساسية الثقافية" كل شيء يمكن أن يسيء يحتمل أن تكون مسلما وستبذل غير المشروعة. لا مزيد من الكحول ، وليس الجنس قبل الزواج أكثر ، وبالتأكيد ليس أكثر المواد الإباحية.
الموافقة المسبقة عن علم ذات الصلة. انها لي بوصفها حقا أنا ، أنت غبي حزم الحطب
I sleep with a lot of girls. I've been HIV positive for at least a couple years now. There has been a lot of discrimination against the HIV positive community in regards to whether or not they should be allowed to have sex. To me, this is a civil rights violation.
ReplyDeleteI frequent area hookah bars and other social gatherings, looking for fun. It's my right to do so. I haven't had very high standards in a long time, I just believe in living each moment to the fullest and taking advantage of what life has to offer. As such, I don't particularly care about my status. Since I am primarily involved with women, and I avoid anal sex, this reduces the chances of me spreading this virus.
The other reason I have for not caring is because the US government can easily distribute a cure, but their bias against the gay and black communities cause them to look the other way. Obviously I'm not going to modify my behavior to help prevent the spread of a disease I'm not responsible for. People get sick each day just by being in proximity to other people who are sick. Are you going to tell people they can't go outside if they have a cold?
Anyway, the reason I'm posting is because I'm wondering what the odds are of an outbreak being traced back to me definitively. Most of my partners don't know my name, so I'd like to think I'm safe. However if someone rats on me there could be problems. What should I expect?
When I was about nine, I had recently gotten a Nintendo Entertainment System from a garage sale down the road, the first gaming system I ever had. One game that I bought was Super Mario Brothers 3, the final chapter of the widely-acclaimed SMB trilogy, which like in the original Super Mario Brothers consisted of Mario/Luigi chasing after Princess Toadstool (whose name has since been bastardized to 'Peach').
ReplyDeleteBack on topic though; I popped in the game in my new NES and pressed Start. I started at World 1, of course, and began playing. During this, I got used to the controls, map, and all that jazz. After all, it IS supposed to be kinda like a tutorial level. So I had advanced to World 2, "Desert Land" and I was moving along rather smoothly. In the back of my mind, I knew that at some point the levels would start to get more difficult. I soon noticed a tile, one unlike the other tiles (Toad houses, numbered tiles, etc). It appeared to be some cross-hybrid of flowing diarrhea and sand, which caught my attention. I navigated my way to the tile, and hit the A button and was warped to what appeared to be a normal level; there even was a happy sunshine in the top left corner!
As I side-scrolled my way through the level, the fucking sun decided to go apeshit and sodomize me repeatedly until I finally broke down in tears, throwing my controller at the ground screaming for my mom. That fucking bastard.
what if one day you woke up and your nipples were completely gone
ReplyDeletelike no scars or anything, just flat skin
and then once you leave your room you find out your dad died last night
and then several days later, you find out that for your entire life your dad had been sneaking into your room while you slept
and sucking on your chest to make to gigantic hickeys where your nipples should be
because you were born without them
not for any sexual reason, just so you would fit in
god bless you dad
All of the examples listed above are predicated on UNlawful arrest.
ReplyDeleteEvery single arrest I've seen was not just lawful, there was active resistance, which justifies the use of non-lethal force.
And if you watch the full 7 minute raw clip from USC, the officers WERE surrounded and were being taunted by the crowd. They tried to move just the folks blocking the pathway - and they actively resisted.
They were warned 3x then shown the can.
Then they got sprayed.
Don't break the law and resist arrest if you can't handle the consequences.
This is exactly why i wish people would stop insulting the Civil Rights movement by comparing it to OWS.
Martin Luther King never cried when he was arrested. It was part of the plan and he took it - boots and all - like a man. THAT is how you win.
Not by having a vague, unclear message, attacking police, urinating in the streets and then crying when you get pepper sprayed lawfully.
It is really sad to see how dumb alot of people are. They cannot see how the elite is taking our freedom, how they use us as debt slaves.. Its all so obvious.. You got to be a real dumb-ass if you're not seeing it by now. You ignorant people dont even realize that you ARE the 99%. WAKE THE F*** UP! Because it wont be very long now before we lose all our rights. Occupiers are standing for a FAIR world for EVERYONE, and they are seen as TERRORIST now..
ReplyDelete