Friday, January 27, 2012

Obama Ratifies ACTA Without Congress

Not only is this (likely) illegal and irrefutably unethical, ACTA is potentially worse than SOPA and PIPA combined.  Thanks, Obama (<NOTICE THAT THERE USED TO BE A LINK TO THE REAL AGENDA, WHICH WAS ALWAYS THERE.  APPARENTLY AN AUTHOR ON THAT SITE SUPPORTS SQUASHING FREE SPEECH/SUPPORTS ACTA.  I WILL DIRECT ANYONE WHO CAN ACTUALLY READ TO LOOK UP "FAIR USE." IRONICALLY, THE REAL AGENDA PROUDLY PROCLAIMS THAT THEY USE FAIR USE ON OTHERS MATERIAL.  ALSO NOTICE BELOW THAT THERE IS A THING CALLED "BLOCK QUOTES," DENOTING THAT THE EXCERPT IS FROM ANOTHER SITE WHICH, ONCE AGAIN, HAS ALWAYS BEEN THERE.  THE QUOTE BELOW NOW IS FROM A MUCH BETTER SITE, THE NEW AMERICAN):
Before the American people were protesting the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Intellectual Property Act, the president managed to sign an international treaty which would permit foreign companies to demand that ISPs (Internet Service Providers) remove web content in the United States without any legal oversight. Entitled the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), the treaty was signed by Obama on October 1, 2011, but it is currently a subject of discussion because the White House is circulating a petition demanding that senators ratify the treaty.

What’s worse is that the White House has done some maneuvering — characterizing the treaty as an "executive agreement" — thereby bypassing approval by members of Congress.
Please bookmark!

3 comments:

  1. Hollywood is paying obama out the ass for this without a doubt. He probably could care less now about being re-elected because i dont see anybody with a brain voting for him after something such as this; sadly however, most of obama's supporters have no brain.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please cite the source of this text or remove it immediately. Plagiarism is as disgusting as censorship of the press. As the writer and Editor of The Real Agenda, source of the text you explicilty plagiarized and pasted here, will only ask you once. Cite your source as it appears on the original article.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not only had I linked to your site, but I also used block quotes showing that it was from your site. I guess you don't like hits, so I removed your site and linked to a much better one.

    ReplyDelete